Meeting the transfusion needs of a patient with anti-Ena requires an international effort.

This extraordinary case showcases the identification of a rare anti-Ena specificity that was assisted by DNA-based red blood cell antigen typing and collaboration between the hospital blood bank in the United States, the home blood center in Qatar, the blood center Immunohematology Reference Laboratory, as well as the American Rare Donor Program (ARDP) and the International Society for Blood Transfusion (ISBT) International Rare Donor Panel. Ena is a high-prevalence antigen, and blood samples from over 200 individuals of the extended family in Qatar were crossmatched against the patient's plasma with one compatible En(a-) individual identified. The ISBT International Rare Donor Panel identified an additional donor in Canada, resulting in a total of two En(a-) individuals available to donate blood for the patient.

Does decreasing the incubation period used in the antibody screen affect its sensitivity?

BACKGROUND: Pre-transfusion testing (PTT) encompasses a set of mandatory laboratory tests performed before red blood cell transfusion. The antibody screen, one component of PTT, commonly includes a 10-20 min incubation. The primary aim of this study was to determine if this period can be reduced when using current immunohematology methodologies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Antibody screens were performed on reagent samples using Glass or Gel-based column agglutination technologies (CAT) and a solid phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) assay, with incubation periods of 1, 5, 10 and 15 min, and 20 min (SPRCA assay only). For each method, the shortest period producing a minimum of a 1+ reaction with all reagent samples was considered optimal. The sensitivity of each assay using the optimal period was calculated after performing antibody screens on 100 patient samples. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: It was demonstrated that the incubation period in the SPRCA and Glass CAT systems can be reduced to 5 and 10 min, respectively, while achieving high assay sensitivity (98.9% in both). The incubation period in the Gel CAT system cannot be reduced from 15 min. Significant association between titre and reaction strength was observed for all three screening methods (p < 0.001 for both CAT methods, p = 0.041 for SPRCA). This study demonstrates that the incubation period used in the antibody screen can be reduced when using systems employing the Glass CAT and SPRCA methods, without affecting assay sensitivity. If confirmed, it could result in faster completion of PTT.

Application of a simplified PCR-SSP method to detect A4GALT*01 and A4GALT*02 typing among Thai blood donors.

OBJECTIVES: An intronic A4GALT single nucleotide variant, rs5751348:G>T, P2 or A4GALT*02 allele has a lower level of the enzyme-encoding A4GALT transcripts than the P1 individuals. Here, we first develop and validate a simple inhouse PCR-SSP method to detect A4GALT*01 and A4GALT*02 alleles, and second, apply this method to compare the allele frequencies between Thai and other populations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The conventional test tube technique was used to detect the P1 antigen in 222 blood samples from Thai blood donors at Thammasat University Hospital. A PCR-SSP method was optimized and validated for reproducibility and specificity to identify these alleles and was subsequently tested on 1,840 DNA samples of unknown phenotypes obtained from central, northern and southern Thais. In addition, allele frequencies of central Thais were compared with those of other populations. RESULTS: In the tested cohort (n = 222), P1 and P2 phenotypes were typed in 26.13 and 73.87% of donors, respectively. The developed PCR-SSP was successfully optimized, and the outcomes were consistent with those of serological phenotyping and DNA sequencing results, demonstrating its validity for predicting P1/P2 phenotype. For central, northern and southern Thais, the A4GALT*01 frequency was 0.1579 (430/2,724), 0.1183 (71/600), and 0.2575 (206/800), whereas the A4GALT*02 frequency was 0.8421 (2,294/2,724), 0.8817 (529/600), and 0.7425 (594/800), respectively. Their observed frequencies among central Thais significantly differed from those in other populations (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study has successfully developed a simple, precise, and reliable method to genotype A4GALT*01 and A4GALT*02 using inhouse developed PCR-SSP for predicting P1/P2 status.

Transfusion Preparedness in the Labor and Delivery Unit: An Initiative to Improve Safety and Cost.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient safety, resource utilization, and transfusion-related cost after a policy change from universal type and screen to selective type and screen on admission to labor and delivery. METHODS: Between October 2017 and September 2019, we performed a single-center implementation study focusing on risk-based type and screen instead of universal type and screen. Implementation of our policy was October 2018 and compared 1 year preimplementation with 1 year postimplementation. Patients were risk-stratified in alignment with California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative recommendations. Under the new policy, the blood bank holds a blood sample for processing (hold clot) on patients at low- and medium-risk of hemorrhage. Type and screen and crossmatch are obtained on high-risk patients or with a prior positive antibody screen. We collected patient outcomes, safety and cost data, and compliance and resource utilization metrics. Cost included direct costs of transfusion-related testing in the labor and delivery unit during the study period, from a health system perspective. RESULTS: In 1 year postimplementation, there were no differences in emergency-release transfusion events (4 vs 3, P>.99). There were fewer emergency-release red blood cell (RBC) units transfused (9 vs 24, P=.002) and O-negative RBC units transfused (8 vs 18, P=.016) postimplementation compared with preimplementation. Hysterectomies (0.05% vs 0.1%, P=.44) and intensive care unit admissions (0.45% vs 0.51%, P=.43) were not different postimplementation compared with preimplementation. Postimplementation, mean monthly type and screen-related costs (ABO typing, antibody screen, and antibody workup costs) were lower, $9,753 compared with $20,676 in the preimplementation year, P<.001. CONCLUSION: Implementation of selective type and screen policy in the labor and delivery unit was associated with projected annual savings of $181,000 in an institution with 4,000 deliveries per year, without evidence of increased maternal morbidity.

Analysis of ABO grouping discrepancies among patients from a tertiary hospital in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Accurate ABO typing is essential for preventing ABO incompatibility reactions. However, the causes of ABO grouping discrepancy has not been sufficiently studied, and it may vary among different ethnic populations. Thus, the aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the causes of ABO discrepancy in the East Asian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study on ABO typing discrepancy among patients in a tertiary hospital was carried out using the electronic medical record database of Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between July 2016 and May 2019. RESULTS: ABO grouping was performed on 551,959 blood samples during the study period; 1468 events of serologic ABO discrepancy were determined from 1334 (0.24 %) samples. A total of 134 samples (0.02 %) presented multiple causes of ABO discrepancy. Weak/missing serum reactivity (594, 40.5 %) was the most frequent reason for ABO discrepancy, followed by extra serum reactivity (370, 25.2 %), weak/missing red cell reactivity (267, 18.2 %), mixed-field red cell reactivity (176, 12.0 %), and extra red cell reactivity (61, 4.2 %). In the category of weak/missing red cell reactivity, ABO subgroup was the most common reason, and using ABO genotyping, 26.2 % of the cases genotyped were found to be related to the cis-AB allele. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the incidence and cause of ABO typing discrepancies vary among institutes and ethnic groups. Our data helps to better understand and facilitate the resolution of ABO typing discrepancies in patients.

Comparison between a laser lancing device and lancet for capillary blood sampling, capillary blood hemoglobin measurement, and blood typing.

BACKGROUND: Blood donor screening includes tests using capillary blood, which is usually obtained by finger pricking using a lancet; however, the lancet has some shortcomings, such as skin puncture pain and needle stick injury. Recently, laser lancing devices for finger-prick sampling have been developed. We compared capillary blood Hb (cHb) levels and blood typing results obtained using a laser lancing device with those obtained using a lancet. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: cHb levels, blood typing results, and skin puncture pain scores were assessed in 191 participants. Finger-prick sampling was performed using LMT-1000 (LaMeditech, Seoul, Korea) and a lancet on the same finger on different hands. Paired venous Hb (vHb) levels were assessed in 103 participants using an automated hematology analyzer and compared with the cHb levels obtained using both lancing devices. RESULTS: The paired cHb results obtained with the laser lancing device and lancet showed a strong correlation (r = 0.927, p < .001) without any significant difference (p = .113) and a substantial agreement (κ = 0.654) for the identification of participants with a low Hb level (<12.5 g/dl). cHb levels were significantly higher than vHb levels with both lancing devices (mean differences: 0.27-0.43 g/dl). The results of blood typing using the laser lancing device showed 100% accuracy. Use of the laser lancing device showed significantly lower skin puncture pain scores (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Use of a laser lancing device for capillary Hb measurement and blood typing showed accurate results, with significantly reduced skin puncture pain. Laser lancing devices could be feasible for donor screening tests.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation with positive crossmatch: Role of delayed kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Positive crossmatch (XM+) combined liver-kidney transplantation due to preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies has produced mixed results. We sought to understand the role of delayed kidney transplant approach in XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations. METHODS: XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations were retrospectively reviewed. T- and B-cell XM, complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch, and flow cytometric crossmatch were performed prospectively. RESULTS: Of 183 combined liver-kidney transplantations performed (2002-2019), 114 (62%) were with "delayed" kidney transplant approach and 19 (19 of 183, 10%) were XM+. Of 19 XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations, kidney transplant was "delayed" in 14 by an average of 47 hours (range 24-64 hours) from liver transplant. There was a significant reduction in both class I (mean pre-liver transplant mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) 26,230 versus mean post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 3,272, P = .01) and total MFI (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 27,233 vs mean post liver transplant and predelayed kidney transplant MFI 11,469, P = .01). However, there was no significant change in the MFI of class II donor-specific antibodies (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 17,899 versus post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 14,341, P = .19). None of XM+ delayed kidney transplants had delayed graft function, and there was no antibody-mediated rejection. One-year patient survival for the XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantation with delayed kidney transplant approach was 92.9%, which is comparable to patient survival of XM- combined liver-kidney transplantation. Whereas patient survival in recipients before "delayed" approach ("simultaneous"; n = 5) was 40% when liver-kidney transplants were performed simultaneously (P = .06). CONCLUSION: In sensitized combined liver-kidney transplantation recipients, the "delayed" kidney transplant approach is associated with a significant reduction in total and class I donor-specific antibodies after liver transplant before kidney transplant, enabling therapeutic interventions such as plasmapheresis, if needed, providing optimal outcomes similar to crossmatch recipients.

Neonatal and pediatric blood bank practice in the United States: Results from the AABB pediatric transfusion medicine subsection survey.

BACKGROUND: There are limited standards guiding the selection and processing of blood components specific for neonatal and pediatric transfusions. Therefore, blood banks (BBs) and transfusion services must create their own policies and procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) Pediatric Transfusion Medicine Subsection Committee developed a 74-question survey to capture neonatal and pediatric BB practices in the United States. RESULTS: Thirty-five centers completed the survey: a response rate 15.8%. Responses indicated that most carry a mixed inventory of red blood cells (RBCs); 94.2% allow more than one type of RBC product for small-volume (SV) and large-volume (LV) transfusions to neonatal and pediatric patients. Many had storage age thresholds for RBCs transfused to neonates (SV = 60%, LV = 67.7%) but not older pediatric patients. The use of Group O for nonurgent RBC transfusion in neonates was common (74.2%). Responses related to special processing of RBCs and platelets indicated that 100% RBC and platelets are leukocyte-reduced (LR) for neonates and 97% for non-neonates. Irradiation of RBCs and platelets was commonly performed for neonatal transfusion (88.6%). Providing cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative products, volume reduction, and washing were variable. All centers transfused single-donor apheresis platelets; 20% allowed pathogen reduction (PR). The majority of centers have strategies limiting the amount of incompatible plasma transfused; however, few titrate ABO isoagglutinins in plasma-containing products (20% for platelets and 9.1% for plasma). CONCLUSIONS: Variability exists in BB practice for neonatal and pediatric transfusion. Future studies are needed to understand and define best BB practices in these patient populations.

When O Bites Back: Unrecognized Acute Hemolytic Reaction from Out-of-Group HLA-Compatible Platelet Transfusion.

Managing a platelet blood product inventory in a hospital-based transfusion service (TS) is challenging. Thus, to optimize platelet inventory availability and to prevent excess outdating, most tertiary care center-based TSs do not require ABO-identical platelet (PLT) transfusions. To mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the transfusion of high titer ABO antibody-containing PLT, our institutional policy allows the transfusion of PLT containing ABO-incompatible plasma only if PLT is re-suspended in platelet additive solution (PAS). Despite the steps taken to reduce the risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions to PLT transfusions at our institution, our center has observed hemolytic reactions to PLT in PAS. The current case study highlights the importance of recognizing a hemolytic reaction (HTR) from ABO-incompatible PLT transfusions and discusses the current strategies and recommendations to mitigate this risk.

Optimizing transfusion management of multiple myeloma patients receiving daratumumab-based regimens.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab, a human anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody used to treat multiple myeloma, interferes with pretransfusion testing and can mask alloantibodies. Incidence of alloimmunization in patients on daratumumab has not been well characterized, and optimal transfusion guidelines regarding prophylactic antigen matching, accounting for both patient safety and efficiency, have not been well established for these patients. METHODS: Records of patients who received daratumumab between January 1, 2014 and July 2, 2019 were reviewed. Daratumumab interference with pretransfusion testing was managed by testing with reagent red blood cells (RBCs) treated with 0.2 M dithiothreitol. When daratumumab was present during antibody testing, patients were transfused with RBC units prophylactically matched for D, C, c, E, e, and K antigens per hospital policy. RESULTS: Out of 90 patients identified, 52 received a total of 638 RBC transfusions (average of 12.3 units per patient, SD 17.2, range 1-105, median 5 among those transfused). Alloantibodies existing before daratumumab initiation were identified in seven patients. No new alloantibodies were detected in any patients after starting daratumumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of alloimmunization in patients receiving daratumumab is low. Whether this is due to the effect of daratumumab, underlying pathophysiology, or other factors, is unknown. Because these patients require a large number of RBC transfusions overall and have little observed alloimmunization, phenotype matching (beyond RhD) may be unnecessary. Since the use of dithiothreitol cannot rule out the presence of anti-K, we recommend transfusion of ABO-compatible units, prophylactically matched for the D and K antigens only.

Improved detection of donor-specific HLA-class II antibody in kidney transplant recipients by modified immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis.

Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) which basic principle is same as Luminex crossmatch (LXM), could detect donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA). The advantages of ICFA are (i) detection of DSA and (ii) no requirement of viable cells over the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). However, FCXM has been widely used because of its higher sensitivity than ICFA, in particular HLA-class II antibody detection. In this study the accuracy of DSA detection against HLA-class II was investigated by modifying the original method of ICFA. Increment of the sensitivity was found when purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used instead of whole blood. An ICFA-PBMC in addition to FCXM-T/B was conducted for 118 patients before kidney transplantation and 13 patients with de novo DSA against HLA-class II after transplantation. Significantly positive correlation was observed between the values of ICFA-PBMC and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) targeting class II (p < 0.0001). When the cutoff level of 1.4 was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the average DSA MFI was found to be significantly higher in the ICFA-PBMC (class II) positive group comparing to that in the negative group (12,217 vs 3885, p = 0.0027). ICFA-PBMC and optimized cutoff level could provide valid information in cases of suspected DSA.

Blood Transfusion Practice in Operating Rooms in Nemazee Hospital in Southern Iran.

BACKGROUND: The requests for blood products in elective surgeries exceed actual use, leading to financial wastage and loss of shelf-life. In this study, we assessed the blood transfusion indices in elective surgeries performed in the operating rooms. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, from January to June 2017, a total of 970 adult patients who underwent elective surgeries in the operating rooms of Nemazee hospital, a general referral hospital in southern Iran, were investigated. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, such as hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), platelets, prothrombin time (PT), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were gathered from medical records. Blood utilization was evaluated using the following indices: cross-match to transfusion ratio (C/T ratio), transfusion probability (T%), transfusion index (TI), and Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule (MSBOS). RESULTS: The overall C/T, T%, and TI ratios were 2.49, 46.6%, and 0.83 for all procedures, and the highest and lowest ratios pertained to the thoracic and cardiac surgeries, respectively. The C/T ratio was ≥2.5 for all surgical procedures except for cardiac surgeries. T% was <30 for thoracic and orthopedics surgeries and ≥30 for other surgical procedures. In all surgical procedures, TI was less than 0.5, except for cardiac surgeries. Also, the MSBOS was about 3 units for cardiac surgeries and ranged from 0.5 to 1 units in other surgeries. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed a high quality blood transfusion practice in cardiac surgeries, possibly due to more focus on this critical ward. Assessing difficulties in the process of reservation, utilization, and preparation of standard protocols and policies are required to improve the blood utilization practice in operating rooms.

A renewed understanding of anti-human globulin reagents: interference constraints using an optimization method in pretransfusion compatibility tests.

Anti-human globulin (AHG) reagents are widely applied in pretransfusion compatibility tests. The accuracy of detection with AHG reagents is mainly affected by irregular antibodies or cold agglutinins in blood samples, which are related to the human complement system. Although much has been written about various types and applications of AHG reagents, their characteristics, interference factors and optimal selection in pretransfusion compatibility tests still need to be further clarified. Here, we review clinical practice and basic studies that describe each AHG reagent, summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using different AHG reagents in the presence of cold agglutinins or complement-fixing antibodies, explore the potential mechanisms by which the complement system influences detection with AHG reagents and address the question of how to optimally select AHG reagents for clinically significant antibody detection.

HLA class I depletion by citric acid, and irradiation of apheresis platelets for transfusion of refractory patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients can form antibodies to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I antigens after exposure to allogeneic cells. These anti-HLA class I antibodies can bind transfused platelets (PLTs) and mediate their destruction, thus leading to PLT refractoriness. Patients with PLT refractoriness need HLA-matched PLTs, which require expensive HLA typing of donors, antibody analyses of patient sera and/or crossmatching. An alternative approach is to reduce PLT HLA Class I expression using a brief incubation in citric acid on ice at low pH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Apheresis PLT concentrates were depleted of HLA Class I complexes by 5 minutes incubation in ice-cold citric acid, at pH 3.0. Surface expression of HLA Class I complexes, CD62P, CD63, phosphatidylserine, and complement factor C3c was analyzed by flow cytometry. PLT functionality was tested by thromboelastography (TEG). RESULTS: Acid treatment reduced the expression of HLA Class I complexes by 71% and potential for C3c binding by 11.5-fold compared to untreated PLTs. Acid-treated PLTs were significantly more activated than untreated PLTs, but irrespective of this increase in steady-state activation, CD62P and CD63 were strongly upregulated on both acid-treated and untreated PLTs after stimulation with thrombin receptor agonist peptide. Acid treatment did not induce apoptosis over time. X-ray irradiation did not significantly influence the expression of HLA Class I complexes, CD62P, CD63, and TEG variables on acid treated PLTs. CONCLUSION: The relatively simple acid stripping method can be used with irradiated apheresis PLTs and may prevent transfusion-associated HLA sensitization and overcome PLT refractoriness.

Divergence in phenotyping and genotyping analysis of the Lewis histo-blood group system.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the red blood cell (RBC) Lewis phenotypes by simple haemagglutination technique and molecular genotyping in healthy individuals. BACKGROUND: The expression of Lewis antigen on RBCs is dependent on the interaction of FUT3 and FUT2 genes. Complexity of the genetic control of Lewis antigen expression and the error-prone nature of Lewis phenotyping result in non-genuine RBC Lewis phenotypes, which could be misleading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ABO blood group and RBC Lewis phenotypes were determined by conventional haemagglutination tube techniques. FUT2 and FUT3 genotypes were analysed by polymerase chain reaction and direct DNA sequencing. The RBC Lewis phenotypes were also inferred from the FUT2 and FUT3 genotyping results. RESULTS: The frequencies of RBC Lewis phenotypes typed by the conventional tube test were Le(a+b-) 19.63%, Le(a-b+) 49.32% and Le(a-b-) 31.05%, whereas the frequencies inferred from the FUT2 and FUT3 genotypes were Le(a+b-) 20.09%, Le(a-b+), 59.82%; Le(a-b-), 17.81%; and Le(a+b+), 5 (2.28%). The Le(a+b+) phenotype was not detected by the tube test, and a significant difference was observed in the frequencies of the determined Le(a-b-) and Le(a-b+) phenotypes. CONCLUSION: The phenotyping and genotyping of Lewis blood group system reveal a high rate of discordance in the frequencies of Lewis phenotypes among the healthy individuals.

Incidence and impact of allele-specific anti-HLA antibodies and high-resolution HLA genotyping on assessing immunologic compatibility.

The ability to identify specific HLA molecules against which a patient has alloantibodies has revolutionized assessment of immunologic compatibility. Anti-HLA antibodies are typically evaluated as reactive against well-defined serologic antigen groups. Thus, donor HLA genotyping is aimed at defining HLA at the serologic split-antigen level to avoid incompatible antigen-antibody combinations. However, anti-HLA antibodies can have reactivities not accurately described by well-defined serologic antigens. While existence of these antibodies is acknowledged, their precise impact on clinical practice is not clear. We performed a single-center review of 2 years of pre-and post-transplant anti-HLA antibody testing data combined with high-resolution HLA genotyping data for living and deceased organ donors to evaluate the clinical impact of anti-HLA antibodies with reactivities outside of commonly defined serologic antigen groups. We find approximately 15% of patients awaiting transplantation have alloantibodies with differential reactivity for HLA proteins encoded by specific alleles within a serologic antigen group. Allele-specific antibodies are associated with positive cellular crossmatches not accurately predicted by standard donor HLA genotyping and can manifest as post-transplant donor-specific antibodies. Our data highlights the importance of evaluating anti-HLA antibodies at the allele-level and provides evidence supporting utility for high-resolution HLA genotyping in solid organ transplantation.

Monocyte monolayer assay in pre-transfusion testing: A magic key in transfusing patients with recurrent bad cross-match due to alloimmunization.

BACKGROUND: The monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) is an in-vitro assay that can predict the outcome of blood transfusion of antigen positive units when serologically compatible blood is not available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients testing positive by the antibody screening test using gel agglutination were further examined by the alloantibody identification panel to determine alloantibody specificity. After determining and categorizing the antibodies, patients' samples were examined using the MMA to determine the clinical significance of the detected alloantibodies. We also tested 2 seeding methods (24-well cell culture plates versus 8-well chamber-slides) and 3 visualization/staining techniques (unstained phase contrast, Leishman and Giemsa staining). RESULTS: 35 out of the 54 cases (64.8%) had a monocyte index of >5% which is predictive of occurrence of hemolytic reaction after transfusion; 23 cases with antibodies known to be clinically significant [anti-C, anti-E, anti-c, anti-K, anti-Fy(a), anti Fy(b), anti-JK(b)], 2 with Anti-M specificity, 7 cases with autoantibodies and 3 cases with multiple antibodies. On the other hand, 19 out of the 54 (35.2%) cases included in the study showed a monocyte index of <5% which is predictive of absence of hemolytic reaction after transfusion. The 8-well chamber-slides were better than the 24-well culture plates, as the latter showed a lot of un-phagocytosed RBCs in the background. Also, Leishman staining was better than Giemsa staining with better and clearer differentiation between the RBCs, monocytes and phagocytic vacuoles. CONCLUSION: MMA can be used as a surrogate cross-match test for the selection of blood units in cases where antigen-negative blood units are not available.

A Flow Cytometric Study of Reagent Cells to Resolve ABO Typing Discrepancy.

OBJECTIVES: RBC alloantibodies can lead to ABO grouping discrepancies unrelated to A or B antigens or antibodies posing challenges in the blood bank testing. Routine blood bank testing and flow cytometry were used to immunophenotype reagent cells and elucidate the cause of ABO discrepancies in two patients. METHODS: ABO discrepancy was identified in two patients after transfusion with several units of RBCs. For both patients, the pretransfusion type and screen demonstrated blood group A. Eight and 16 days later, both patients showed an apparent antibody to reagent group A cells, which prompted additional study with patients' samples and flow cytometric testing of commercial reagent cells. RESULTS: In both patients' specimens, posttransfusion evaluation demonstrated an emerging antibody to the Kell antigen (K). The RBCs of both patients typed negative for K, and both were transfused with K-positive RBCs. Flow cytometric analysis of reagent RBCs demonstrated that five of seven lot numbers were positive for K. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging anti-K antibody led to agglutination of the K-positive reagent A1 cells, highlighting the importance of considering RBC alloantibodies and the composition of reagent cells when interpreting cases with an apparent ABO grouping discrepancy.